|
Blog -
Tech
|
|
Written by Jmaxxz
|
|
Monday, 12 July 2010 17:15 |
|
Got this email today:
Good news! You're in! Thousands of Digg users responded to our call for alpha testers, but you are among the few chosen at an early stage to check out what our team has been working on.
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 31 August 2010 04:57 |
|
|
Blog -
Tech
|
|
Written by Jmaxxz
|
|
Sunday, 28 February 2010 23:40 |
|
Today I went to port the Jmaxxz Vulgar Word Blocker over into a Chrome userscript, and I was met by the pleasant surprise that it worked without any changes on my part. This is thanks to Google's efforts in include Greasemonkey support into Chrome.
Actually it goes a step further than that, I have found the Jmaxxz Vulgar Word Blocker works better in Chrome than it does in Firefox, as it actually works with Google search results in Chrome!
Download scripts by Jmaxxz(tm)
|
|
Last Updated on Saturday, 06 March 2010 14:18 |
|
Blog -
Tech
|
|
Written by Jmaxxz
|
|
Wednesday, 04 November 2009 06:29 |
|
Recently while doing some developing a proof of concept to exploit a weak authentication system on a wireless network I found the following major security vulnerability in Firefox.
Situation:
User is at a http page with a loggin form which has a https post back address (like facebook). In this case though the certificate on the postback address is invalid, (due to a man in the middle attack, or lazy network admins.) When the user click the loggin button firefox opens an https tunnel and sends the username and password across the wire using the bad certificate. It is only after this post is completed that firefox notifies the user the cert was invalid. This means that even though the https connection was using an invalid certificate the user never had the chance to cancel the send of the loggin data.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 20 November 2009 19:08 |
|
|
Blog -
Tech
|
|
Written by Jmaxxz
|
|
Saturday, 15 August 2009 09:05 |
|
I have to give Wester Digital a lot of credit for how they responded when I told them my old 500GB external hard drive (which I am pretty sure was out of warrenty) died. Within 24hrs of me telling them its serial number and where I lived a new 750GB hard drive showed up in the mail.
While I may no longer exlusively buy Western Digital drives, I am open to giving them another chance, and just putting more money into redundency on my end so if a drive does fail I do not loose everything.
Bottom line, I've had some bad luck with Western Digital drive, and some great luck with Western Digital customer service.
|
|
Blog -
Tech
|
|
Written by Jmaxxz
|
|
Sunday, 02 August 2009 09:27 |
|
Over the past several years I have purchased 3 Western Digital hard drives, and I was looking to by another one in the next couple months, because Western Digital was the only name I trusted to keep my data safe. But alas that trust has been broken, and never again will buy a Western Digital drive.
|
|
Last Updated on Sunday, 02 August 2009 09:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 7 |